Creating an ISRU Economy

Ball's in your court. Pass it on!

BLACK LIVES MATTER

 

The in-space economy is still at $0 per year.

In-Space Economy/ISRU Economy: products and services in space, that are bought, sold, and used in space, that are created entirely from the raw materials and other resources found in space. (This definition is more valuable and necessary than one might think. Click here for a thorough discussion.)

ISRU: In Situ Resource Utilization. Using what's available locally. Shopping at your local farmer's market, etc.

Lunar water for sale. Only $0.99 per gallon, plus $100,000 shipping and handling from Earth. When the next closest store is 240,000 miles away, buying local takes on a whole new meaning.
This image illustrates the enormous incentive, opportunity, and necessity of learning how to use local lunar resources if we ever want to get back to the Moon.

Welcome to Space Centric!

Solutions to the problems that are preventing our future in space. Solutions to get us past our low Earth orbit (LEO) “barrier”.

 

The White House wants NASA to send people back to the Moon by 2024 and to Mars in the 2030's. Problem is, most people rank these at the bottom of NASA's priority list. (NASA Opinion Polls)

How much do you think this will cost? Do you think you'll get anything out of it? Or is it just billions of tax dollars being siphoned out of your wallet without your permission and no end in sight?

Space Centric (and others) has a more sensible approach...switch our focus from "exploration" to building a self-supporting in-space economy. This gives us the ability to stay there, instead of having to cancel programs and put our rockets in museums when the funding and/or political support runs out.

U.S. Capitol Building. As a tax-payer and voter, YOU have the power to shape NASA's direction and our future in space.
U.S. Capitol Building. Photo by Ben Shafer from FreeImages.

Humanity’s future in space is dependent on basic changes to NASA’s focus (or creating a separate entity)...changes that make sense to the majority of taxpayers (not just the ones who think space should be a priority). In addition, 78% of US workers live paycheck to paycheck (CareerBuilder survey) and can't afford more taxes or more national debt. The destination/exploration-focused flags and footprints efforts of Apollo, Constellation, Artemis, and The Path to Mars weren't/aren't focused on building our financial ability to explore space.

There are only so many tax dollars available for space exploration. The last 50+ years of data shows the limits of NASA funding. If we want a future in space, we need to realize that "exploration" is a secondary (or lower) priority of our nation's economy, and necessarily a very small portion of our budget.

New cities and civilizations aren't created by exploration, they're created by the resourceful activities of those who try to make a living there. Our present approach to advancing our future in space is actually BACKWARDS! It's skipping the essential step of creating the economy. This is why we're stuck in low Earth orbit.

Instead of exploration, we need to focus on creating a self-supporting in-space economy, starting at the Moon, using the local lunar resources to create the goods and services involved/needed in a lunar economy.

***An economy that's primarily taking place AT the Moon.***

This approach is supportable, financially and politically, by politicians and taxpayers, because it pays the bills. This approach leads us forward with increasing returns, decreasing reliance on taxes and, a vibrant future in space. This is how people will eventually be able to live on the Moon and Mars...their local economy will make it possible. This is what will drive our progress in space. This is how we'll get past our low Earth orbit barrier.

Power Post:

A solution that will enable our future in space.

What goes good with a mocha and a very tasty pita pocket sandwich? A back of the napkin list of most of the major systems needed for astronauts to go to the surface of Mars. Getting to Mars will require developing and/or operating several major systems concurrently. This is a problem. The last 50 years has shown that NASA has enough funding to concurrently develop only one major human space exploration system while operating one major system.
Pita. Mocha. Mars.
Ball's in your court. Pass it on!